Re: [Wg-rms] Stepping down from co-chair role

[Terry Manderson <terry@apnic.net>]

Jas,

> Maybe APNIC can clarify if the intent is to turn it
> off tomorrow or guide people through some phased
> transition?

The intent of the policy as presented at APNIC 22 called for a phased 
implementation of the policy based on object type. The implementation 
periods proposed were:

    -  4 months after adoption:     Stop accepting email updates for
                                    domain objects
    -  8 months after adoption:     Stop accepting email updates for
                                    inetnum, inet6num, and aut-num
                                    objects
    -  12 months after adoption:    Stop accepting email update for the
                                    remaining object types

Do you see these as too aggressive? Not aggressive enough? poor 
structure?

There is no hard and fast rule that says the implementation can't be 
lengthened or shortened as the membership requires.

Now is a good opportunity to suggest alterations to the proposal.

Cheers,
Terry
--
Terry Manderson                         email:      terry@apnic.net
Network Operations Manager, APNIC       sip:    info@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                    phone:      +61 7 3858 3100