APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists wg-ipv6-guide 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Wg-ipv6-guide] IPv6 Guidelines document - status



Dear WG chairs,

Just a quick note to let you know the status of the editing of the IPv6 Guidelines document.
We have currently just completed a first draft edit. This is currently going through a review. With the Easter holidays coming up here, it may take a little longer to complete the review than anticipated.

I also have a query regarding the section on 'Existing IPv4 infrastructure'. At the recent APNIC Open Policy meeting there was consensus on the proposal :

http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-016-v002.html

to make more explicit the use of IPv4 infrastructure for organisations applying for IPv6 address space. This proposal is currently subject to review (until May 3rd) and will then be put to the EC for their endorsement. I presume you wish to release this document earlier? My question is - do you wish the Secretariat to include references to this proposal in the guidelines. I think it makes sense and I do expect the proposal to be approved.

One other thing - we have removed the section pertaining to the APNIC whois database. The reason for this is that the database information will be somewhat duplicated by :

http://www.apnic.net/db/index.html
http://www.apnic.net/services/whois_guide.html#policy
http://www.apnic.net/docs/database-update-info.html

and section 5.3 LIR to ISP assignment of APNIC-089 and information in Section '5.5 Registration' of APNIC-089.

If you feel that information is lost by doing this, can I suggest that we look at updating existing database 'help' style documentation, rather than creating separate information.

Similarily the DNS info for IPv6 is covered by this guide:

http://www.apnic.net/services/dns_guide.html

If you feel there is information missing, I would strongly recommend we seek to update this guide rather than the 'IPv6 Guidelines document'.

Look forward to hearing from you,

Anne
--