[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wg-ipv6-guide] RE: Wg-ipv6-guide digest, Vol 1 #10 - 1 msg
> | > And I think it's better to separate 'number of /48s' and 'prefix
> | > size' issue. At 1st allocation, an ISP gets one more /32 (this ISP has
> | > /31 prefix), and at 2nd subsequent allocation, the ISP gets one more
> | > /31(/30 prefix, consequently) (is this correct?).
> |
> | Sorry, I'm not sure if I understand your point. Could you please
> | explain a little bit more?
>
> Well, I think bellow two points should be written in guidelines.
> (I'm not sure my understanding is correct)
>
> POINT 1:
> 1) an ISP can offer first subsequent allocation if 7,132 * 48s of their
> address block.
>
> 2) The ISP will offer second subsequent allocation after they allocate
> more 5,285 (12,417 totally) /48s.
>
>
> POINT 2:
> a) The ISP will at least get one more /32 at 1). Then, the ISP has /31
> address size.
>
> b) The ISP will get one more /31 at 2). Then it will have /30.
Thanks for the clafication. I understand, and yes, I think it's a good
idea to seperately describe these two points.
Izumi
