![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
At 20:10 02/03/14 +0900, Takashi Arano wrote: >On the other hand, proposals for changes from Japan were rejected >because other people don't need these changes in their countries. >However, one issue raised regarding RIR/NIR consideration >for LIR’s address shortage during evaluation will be discussed more. Would you clarify whether the problems in Japan were identified or they were concluded as a non issue. If the problem was identified and disregarded, it means that the guideline will not solve problems specific to one country even if they are serious. If the problem was concluded as a non issue, it means that JPNIC will have freedom to solve it independent from APNIC. Yoshihiro Obata - - This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net