RE: [WG-BB] other issues

[Anne Lord <anne@apnic.net>]

Arano San,

My feeling is no. These 8 x /32 assignments would still be considered part 
of the ISP cable ethernet. Where a router exists at the customer site, this 
then becomes the customers routed network and an assignment (if the network 
is shorter than a /30) to be registered in the database.

Does that make sense?

Other opinions?

Anne
--


At 01:52 PM 2/28/02 +0900, Takashi Arano wrote:
>Anne,
>
>Thanks for your comments.
>
>At 11:46 02/02/28, Anne Lord wrote:
> > > 3) registration criteria
> > >
> > > Although a proposal to change /30 to /28 was raised
> > > at Taipei meeting, no more opinions seem to follow this.
> > >
> > > One question I got is how to deal with multiple /32s.
> > > This can be seen as a typical situation in cable network.
> > >
> > > My suggestion: /30 or 4 /32s should be the threshold.
> >
> >The actual document said any prefix shorter than a /30 ie. /29 and
> >shorter. So registration is not required for /30 and longer.
>
>One question.
>In PPPoE services, do 8 of /32s to the same household with the same
>account need to be registered?
>
>Arano
>
>-
>- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net


-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net