RE: [WG-BB] other issues

[Takashi Arano <arano@gblx.ad.jp>]

All,

I would like to summarize WG's opinions to SIG,
but there seems to be sufficient number of opinions 
about these 3 items.
Any other opinions except Skeeve's?

Anyway, I will try to do this, according to 
what I hear and saw in previous APNIC meeting or other places.

1) customer list

Some people strongly disagree with submission obligation.
On the other hand, registries need more clear evidence
to justify the number the applicant submits. 

My suggestion;
APNIC/NIR may require applicants to submit a customer list
or something equivalent to proof the number the applicant
submits.

2) assignment justification

It is difficult to summarize this. Many people have
pointed out there are more than one PC in one household
these days, but this seems not give enough reasons
to skip justification for /29 or something.

My suggestion: Let's keep the original proposal and
make the guideline ASAP. In parallel, we should
continue to discuss this issue.

3) registration criteria

Although a proposal to change /30 to /28 was raised
at Taipei meeting, no more opinions seem to follow this.

One question I got is how to deal with multiple /32s.
This can be seen as a typical situation in cable network.

My suggestion: /30 or 4 /32s should be the threshold.


Let me know your any idea. If you simply agree, 
saying just YES would be very helpful for makikng 
consensus and making good progress. Thanks.

Regards,
Takashi Arano


At 15:26 02/02/13, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>ahhh ok.. EXCEPT those issues..
>
>That is good... because I would consider our customer lists to be highly
>confidential and conveying that information to APNIC - for ANY reason
>would not be acceptable.
>
>As a side note, I would say that at least 50% of our xDSL customers
>require a /30 as they have multiple mail or web servers (mutiple
>platforms).
>
>...Skeeve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-wg-bb@lists.apnic.net 
> > [mailto:owner-wg-bb@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Takashi Arano
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:31 PM
> > To: wg-bb@lists.apnic.net
> > Subject: [WG-BB] other issues
> > 
> > 
> > All,
> > 
> > In the previous SIG and AGM at Taipei, our draft was
> > accepted by the community, EXCEPT these three issues.
> > 
> > 1) customer list
> > 2) assignment justification 
> > 3) registration threshold
> > 
> > I would like to make some consensus on these issues
> > among this working group BEFORE the next SIG at Bangkok,
> > and present some suggestions to the public there.
> > 
> > Please give us any idea about these.
> > Thank you for your cooperation!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Takashi Arano
> > 
> > -
> > - This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
> > 

-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net