Re: [WG-BB] some explanation about the issues raised (fwd)

[John Tran <john@apnic.net>]

Hi all,

please ignore my last email. I was thinking in term of address size rather
than prefix.

son

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:48:35 +1000 (EST)
From: John Tran <john@apnic.net>
To: Takashi Arano <arano@gblx.ad.jp>
Cc: wg-bb@lists.apnic.net
Subject: Re: [WG-BB] some explanation about the issues raised


Arano-san,

Just one point to clarify here

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Takashi Arano wrote:

> Just FYI to think. Arano
> 
> 1) customer list
> 
> Draft:
> APNIC/NIR may require applicants to submit a customer list
> 
> Argument: 
> It may not be always a good thing to force the applicants to
> submit this kind of list because of information security.
> 
> 2) assignment justification
> 
> Draft: 
> 1:1 static is OK. If you need more, you should justify fully
> as we usually do.
> 
> Argument: 
> It is too restrictive because now many household have more than
> one PCs. 
> 
> 3) registration threshold
> 
> Draft: 
> You should register for assignment shorter than /30.
> For /30 or longer, it is optional.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Can you please clarify whether this is correct. I thought it is mandatory
not optional that why it is an issue if it is optional then there won't be
an issue.

son
                   
> 
> Argument:
> /30 is too small. Why not /28
> 
> 
> 
> -
> - This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
> 

-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net

-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net