| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
| > >| I think making assignment base on ports make sense but base on the | > >| bandwidth is not a good idea because some isp can use the same bandwidth | > >| for many users depending on the service each isp trying to sell to their | > >| customers. As we are applying the policy to the AP region therefore | > >| we should consider this. | > >| | > >I'd like to say here is that there are two specifications | > >for Cable modem systems which provides 10Mbps and 30Mbps and | > >it is easily distinguished by the name of product. It may be | > >too many if all systems are recognized as 30Mbps and too | > >few as 10Mbps. How do you like this, Son? | > | >It is not his point. | >He says that the number of addresses needed for 30Mbps varies | >case by case. | That is why we feel like defining default size for bootstrap, isn't it? | yes. the market is very different across the region. Some are much less | developed and the same amount of bandwidth would serve many many more | customers in some countries and less in others. it is difficult to make one | rule. I feel a more concrete measure is the number of ports. | So do I. Namely default /23 to a single 30Mbps cable which ocupies one downstream port of CMTS. Make sense? I think I'm on your side... I'm afraid my bad explanation made you confused... Regards, Akinori - - This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
