APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists wg-bb 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [WG-BB] Study Report: CATV assignment guidline



| > | Do you mean one 30Mbps type cable is automatically given /23? 
| > | I can't  see any condition about "number of downstream ports"....
| > | 
| > You're right, I mean here that /23 per one 30Mbps type 
| > downstream cable will make sense.
| > 
| > In case of 10Mbps type cable /24 will make sense while it 
| > isn't propotional
| >  
| > 
| > I meant a certain sized block per CMTS won't make sense but
| > per downstream cable will do.  Moreover, capacity differs
| > by its specification 
| 
| I think making assignment base on ports make sense but base on the
| bandwidth is not a good idea because some isp can use the same bandwidth
| for many users depending on the service each isp trying to sell to their
| customers. As we are applying the policy to the AP region therefore
| we should consider this.
| 
I'd like to say here is that there are two specifications 
for Cable modem systems which provides 10Mbps and 30Mbps and
it is easily distinguished by the name of product. It may be
too many if all systems are recognized as 30Mbps and too
few as 10Mbps.  How do you like this, Son?

Regards,
Akinori
-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net