Re: Fwd: [WG-BB] IMPORTANT - follow up.

[Yi Lee <yilee@mozart.seed.net.tw>]

Takashi Arano wrote:
> 
> Thank you, Ezura-san.
> 
> At 19:24 01/08/08 +0900, Yoshiyuki Ezura wrote:
> >Only one big difference is, maybe,
> >
> >in the TW proposal, regarding business ADSL services depending
> >transmission speed, /29 is assigned for under 512K and /29-/27
> >are assigned for over 512K
> >
> >and
> >
> >in the WG proposal, full technical justification is necessary
> >for more than /32 assignment,
> 
> So far it is OK. I understand the difference.
> 
> >and in addition, if an organigzation
> >requests subsequent allocation to cable or xDSL services, some
> >informations provided growth rate of subscribers is needed.
> 
> What does this mean?
> 

For a service provider that passed the "boot-strap phase", it can
have much more potential subscribers and, consequemtly, more IP
addresses are required. For NIR to approve or disaprove, the request
of IP address allocation should be supported by information from 
service providers like growth rate of subscribers or pruchase proof 
of devices, etc. You can interpret it likes this: "the more you need IP
addresses, the harder you have to prove it."

To tell the truth, service providers might not like this idea. :-)

Yi Lee
-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net