[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Fwd: [WG-BB] IMPORTANT - follow up.
Hi,
I examined two proposals and found almost all issues TW proposes
are covered in the WG proposal such as 1:1 static and whois DB
privacy issue.
Only one big difference is, maybe,
in the TW proposal, regarding business ADSL services depending
transmission speed, /29 is assigned for under 512K and /29-/27
are assigned for over 512K
and
in the WG proposal, full technical justification is necessary
for more than /32 assignment, and in addition, if an organigzation
requests subsequent allocation to cable or xDSL services, some
informations provided growth rate of subscribers is needed.
Regards,
Yoshiyuki Ezura
JPNIC
At 16:39 01/08/08 +0900, Takashi Arano wrote:
>Hi Gerard, how are you?
>
>At this time, please add this sentence or equivalent to the proposal
>according to Obata-san's suggestion.
>
>in "Criteria for first allocation to new cable or xDSL services"
>--------------
>"Note that the bootstrap phase can be applied for not only startup providers
>but new services of existing providers"
>--------------
>
>Merging TW and WG proposals may take time. I asked Ezura-san of JPNIC
>to think this together and we will show you what differences are and
>what discussion points are soon.
>
>So, please modify just this part and make it public as soon as possible.
>Is anybody OK with this?
>Thank you very much.
>
>Regards,
>Takashi Arano
>
>At 17:46 01/08/06 +1000, Gerard Ross wrote:
>>Hello Arano-san
>>
>>I am happy to do the editing on this document, as I prepared the first draft
>>for the BB-WG.
>>
>>However, I will need a clear indication from the WG and others as to exactly
>>what issues need to be merged. Perhaps it would help if you could add
>>comments to the existing documents. Simple dot-points should be fine (rather
>>than actually re-writing the document).
>>
>>I can then try to synthesise these points and circulate the next draft.
>>
>>Regards
>>- Gerard
>>
>>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>Gerard Ross, Documentation Manager <gerard@apnic.net>
>>Asia Pacific Network Information Centre ph +61 7 3367 0490
>>http://www.apnic.net fx +61 7 3367 0482
>>______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-wg-bb@lists.apnic.net [mailto:owner-wg-bb@lists.apnic.net]On
>> > Behalf Of Takashi Arano
>> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:50 AM
>> > To: Anne Lord; wg-bb@apnic.net
>> > Cc: Chia-Nan Hsieh; yilee@mozart.seed.net.tw
>> > Subject: Re: Fwd: [WG-BB] IMPORTANT - follow up.
>> >
>> >
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I am sorry for not responding. I have been very busy since I have
>> > moved companies.
>> >
>> > We have two proposals for the BB issue but I hope to have just
>> > ONE merged document before the address policy SIG if possible.
>> > If we had two proposals at the SIG, maybe nothing would be decided there
>> > and another half year would be spent until the next APNIC meeting.
>> >
>> > Now I urgently would like to call for volunteers who will try to
>> > merge two documents from WG members.
>> > Maybe the first thing to do is to point out conflicted parts,
>> > i.e., make clear discussion points.
>> >
>> > Meantime, current documents should be public for any opinion from
>> > the outside.
>> >
>> > We do not have much time before Taipei meeting. We have to
>> > collaborate now.
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Takashi Arano
>> >
>> > At 18:33 01/07/18 +1000, Anne Lord wrote:
>> >
>> > >Wg members,
>> > >
>> > >The working group draft revised cable policy is at :
>> > >
>> > > > http://www.apnic.net/drafts/cable.html
>> > > >
>> > >Some useful comments have been received, and APNIC needs to know
>> > >exactly how you would like the document to be modified. It would be
>> > >helpful if you would indicate the exact sections and approximate
>> > >wording you would like.
>> > >
>> > >The proposal by TWNIC is documented at:
>> > >
>> > >http://www.apnic.net/temp/twnic-bb-proposal.html
>> > >
>> > >No comments have been received on this proposal. How do you wish to
>> > >proceed. Currently we have both items listed as presentations for
>> > >the address policy sig. Please see:
>> > >
>> > >http://www.apnic.net/meetings/12/sigs/address_policy.html
>> > >
>> > >APNIC would like to ask the working group for directions on how we
>> > >should proceed on these two issues. Either way, we need to make papers
>> > >available for download, one month in advance of our meeting ie. by the
>> > >29th July which is soon.
>> > >
>> > >Look forward to hearing from you.
>> > >
>> > >Regards,
>> > >
>> > >Anne
>> > >_____________________________________________________________________
>> > >Anne Lord, Manager, Policy Liaison <anne@apnic.net>
>> > >Asia Pacific Network Information Centre phone: +61 7 3367 0490
>> > >http://www.apnic.net fax: +61 7 3367 0482
>> > >_____________________________________________________________________
>> >
>> > -
>> > - This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
>> >
>
>-
>- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
>
>
>
-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
