RE: [Wg-apnic-fees] Fee proposal version 2.3

[<makai@bb.softbank.co.jp>]

Dear all,

This draft(2.3) said not increasing revenue.
Excude me making it to confusing. 

> >However, I don't know how an revenue increase of 10-15% will be used.

Best regards,
-- 
akai

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 赤井　卓(ネットワーク本部) 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:56 PM
> To: 'Paul Wilson'; wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
> Subject: RE: [Wg-apnic-fees] Fee proposal version 2.3
> 
> Dear Paul-san,
> 
> Thank you for your hard work to develop the new version of the draft,
> however I am a bit disappointed that you have not responded 
> to my questions 
> which were concerning about the transparency of the APNIC 
> business plans and 
> justifications for the increase.
> In this version we will be charged more than four times as 
> much as we are right 
> now, but it is really difficult for us to convince our 
> management to pay the new 
> increased membership fee without any *valid* explanation.
> 
> We will be glad if you kindly give us your thoughts on that,
> and please let me know if you've already given it to us and 
> we miss that.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Masaru AKAI
> mailto:makai@bb.softbank.co.jp
> ISP Planning Group
> Technology Division Technology Planning Dept.
> Network Technology Headquarters 
> Softbank BB, Corp.
> 
> 
> My Questions are below,
> 
> >However, I don't know how an revenue increase of 10-15% will be used.
> Do you have any documents that can be judged for the budget 
> to be distributed 
> properly?
> 
> >I think all RIRs are doing almost same activity.
> >so, there is no large difference between RIRs.
> >Why does ONLY APNIC plan to increase fee?
> Can you show the reason why only APNIC is expensive?
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wg-apnic-fees-bounces@apnic.net 
> > [mailto:wg-apnic-fees-bounces@apnic.net] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:10 PM
> > To: wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
> > Subject: [Wg-apnic-fees] Fee proposal version 2.3
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > Please find attached a revision to the earlier fee structure 
> > proposal.  The 
> > changes from previous versions include the following:
> > 
> > - updated membership and allocation figures (to 1 November 2006);
> > - selection of an initial fee level which produces no change
> >   in expected revenues;
> > - a proposed series of questions for a future membership vote.
> > 
> > Please note that this is a personal proposal from myself as 
> > APNIC DG.  The 
> > APNIC EC has reviewed this document and is considering the 
> > next steps which 
> > are appropriate.
> > 
> > I look forward to your feedback on this important issue.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > __________
> > Paul Wilson                                 email:     
> > pwilson@apnic.net
> > Director General, APNIC                     sip:    
> > apnic@voip.apnic.net
> > http://www.apnic.net                        phone:       +61 
> > 7 3858 3100
> >