Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments - prop-053: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /22

[Alastair Johnson <aj@sneep.net>]

David Woodgate wrote:
> As a point of order, shouldn't the final call be made on a new 
> version of the text that eliminates the references to fees and 
> membership tiers, to reflect the changes made at the SIG meeting?
>
> I don't think a final call should be made on a version of the 
> document that is known to be different from the agreed proposal.

I agree with David.  The proposal needs to be updated to reflect the 
outcome of the discussion last week.

aj