Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule

To: Raul Echeberria <raul@lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:17:29 +0900
Cc: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Delivered-to: sig-policy@clove.apnic.net
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.1.20071030165656.04a47410@lacnic.net>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <472193F2.1070709@apnic.net> <472197BD.8020405@psg.com> <7.0.1.0.1.20071030165656.04a47410@lacnic.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

>> am i correct that apnic is the only region with a voting policy other
>> than one membership == one vote?
> No, you are not correct. :-)

happens more and more often with age ;)

> LACNIC has also differential votes. (1 to 5).

could you point us to a web page explaining?  thanks!

randy

References:
- [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule
  - From: Sunny <sunny@apnic.net>
- Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule
  - From: Raul Echeberria <raul@lacnic.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule
Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule
Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC member fee schedule
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread