Re: [sig-policy] prop-051: Global policy for the allocation of the remaining IPv4 address space

[Raul Echeberria <raul@lacnic.net>]

At 08:44 p.m. 26/07/2007, Philip Smith wrote:
> Hi Raul,
>
> Raul Echeberria said the following on 27/7/07 03:04:
> >
> > It is very clear. In fact I don't think that 
> any RIR promote the use of NAT.
>
> Do RIRs promote the use of real IP addresses instead of NAT? (Open
> question, I don't really know the answer.)

Yes, in our case (LACNIC) the answer is Yes.

I don't want to become involved in the specific 
discussion about this proposal, at least by now, 
and in fact I didn't say any thing in favor or against it.
My only intention was to point out that this is 
not a problem between LACNIC region and for 
instance APNIC region. This discussion needs of a global perspective.

Just discuss the merits or the problems of the policy itself.


Raúl