Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy

[Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>]

Hi Son,


Thanks for drafting the document. The following two parts still leave
descriptions based on /48 assignments. Perpaps they should be revised too?

2.7.  Utilization
   Unlike IPv4, IPv6 is generally assigned to end sites in fixed amounts
   (/48).
   ---> suggestion
        remove the whole sentence for consistency with the new policy

5.1.1.c)
   plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations to which it
   will assign /48s, ... ... ....
   --> suggestion
       change "it will assign /48" --> "it will make assignments"

izumi

Son Tran wrote:
> Dear SIG Members
> 
> 
> APNIC seeks final editorial comments on the following draft document:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> * IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This document has been updated to reflect the implementation of the
> following policy proposals:
> 
> 
>      prop-031: Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and utilisation
>                requirement policy
> 
>      prop-033: End site assignment policy for IPv6
> 
>      prop-035: IPv6 portable assignment for multihoming
> 
> 
> The changes are as follows:
> 
>      - In section 5.1.1.1 d), the reference to a "plan for at least
>        200 /48 assignments" has been replaced by a "plan for at least
>        200 assignments".
>      - The HD ratio has been changed from 0.8 to 0.94 in sections
>        5.2.2 and 7.
>      - The size of assignments has been left to the LIR or ISP's
>         discretion on section 5.4.1.
>      - A new portable assignment criteria has been inserted as section
>        5.8.1. The section numbers for Internet Exchange Points and
>        critical infrastructure have therefore been incremented.
> 
> 
> The document is available at:
> 
>     http://www.apnic.net/docs/drafts/draft-ipv6-address-policy-v004.txt
> 
> 
> This draft is intended to implement the consensus decisions reached
> at APNIC 20 and APNIC 22 and endorsed by the Executive Council
> on 25 November 2005 and 15 December 2006. Details of the original
> proposal and links to discussions are available at:
> 
>      http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals
> 
> 
> Nature of the document review
> -----------------------------
> This is an editorial review only. The APNIC community has already
> reached consensus on the policy issues which are to implemented.
> 
> Therefore, during the comment period, interested parties may:
> 
>    - object to the draft document on the grounds that it does not
>      properly reflect the consensus decision reached in the Policy
>      Review Process;
>    - suggest improvements of any aspect of the document;
>    - request that an additional call for comment be made to allow
>      more consideration of substantial revisions.
> 
> 
> Deadline for comments
> -------------------
> Your comments are requested by 9 March 2007. Please send your
> comments to the sig-policy mailing list. Details at:
> 
>     http://www.apnic.net/community/lists
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Son Tran                              email:           son@apnic.net
> Policy Development Manager, APNIC     sip:        son@voip.apnic.net
> http://www.apnic.net                  phone:         +61 7 3858 3100
>                                        fax:           +61 7 3858 3199
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy