Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC Fee Schedule: Membership Tiers, Fees, ,and Descriptions

[Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka@nic.ad.jp>]

Dear Son,

(wearing a hat of one of APNIC members)

According to the EC minutes for the endorsement of this proposal on 
November 2005 (*) it says "The EC formally endorsed this proposal, 
subject to its implementation not having an effect on the per-address 
fee schedule."

(*) http://www.apnic.net/ec/minutes/20051125.html#4

However this document does have an effect on the per-address fee 
schedule. So I feel this document doesn't properly reflect the consensus 
decision reached in the policy review process.

I would appreciate your clarification.

Best regards,
Toshi
--
Toshiyuki Hosaka
JPNIC



Son Tran wrote (2007/02/09 15:48):
> Dear SIG Members
>
> APNIC seeks final editorial comments on the following draft document:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> * APNIC Fee Schedule: Membership Tiers, Fees, and Descriptions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This document has been updated to reflect the implementation of the
> policy proposal "prop-031: Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and
> utilisation requirement policy".
>
> The change is as follows:
>
>      - Section 3.3.3, "IPv6 address space", incorporates the HD ratio
>        change from 0.8 to 0.94
>
> The draft document is available at:
>
>     http://www.apnic.net/docs/drafts/draft-member-fee-schedule-v005.txt
>
> This draft is intended to implement the consensus decision reached
> at APNIC 20 and endorsed by the Executive Council on 25 November 2005
> in relation to proposal prop-031-002. Details of the original
> proposal and links to discussions are available at:
>
>      http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-031-v002.html
>
>
> Nature of the document review
> -----------------------------
> This is an editorial review only. The APNIC community has already
> reached consensus on the policy issues which are to implemented.
>
> Therefore, during the comment period, interested parties may:
>
>    - object to the draft document on the grounds that it does not
>      properly reflect the consensus decision reached in the Policy
>      Review Process;
>    - suggest improvements of any aspect of the document;
>    - request that an additional call for comment be made to allow
>      more consideration of substantial revisions.
>
>
> Deadline for comments
> -------------------
> Your comments are requested by 9 March 2007. Please send your
> comments to the sig-policy mailing list. Details at:
>
>     http://www.apnic.net/community/lists
>
>
> Regards
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Son Tran                              email:           son@apnic.net
> Policy Development Manager, APNIC     sip:        son@voip.apnic.net
> http://www.apnic.net                  phone:         +61 7 3858 3100
>                                        fax:           +61 7 3858 3199
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy