[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [sig-policy] The fees and slowness of policy.
Title: RE: [sig-policy] The fees and slowness of policy.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net on behalf of Jas Webb
>Sent: Wed 9/13/2006 8:38 PM
>To: Kenny Huang
>Cc: sig-policy@apnic.net; wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
>Subject: RE: [sig-policy] The fees and slowness of policy.
>
>
>Kenny,
>
>I read this message as "to change the game, play the
>game" and that is fair, and I guess I had that coming.
>
>While I accept that the ideal of a bottom up process
>is of value, I am sceptical that any real change will
>happen as the overriding voting mechanisms are biased
>to large operators.
Hi Jas,
Great discussion you have started, possibly one that is long overdue.
In regards to voting though, I am pretty certain (can't find the info on APNIC website to confirm) that the extra votes for Large, Extra Large members etc. only come into play for things like elections of EC members.
When it comes to voting on policy changes, every member gets one vote, so you can definitely make a change.
A helpful APNIC staff member may want to confirm/deny this though:)
Cheers,
Tim.
