APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists sig-policy 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-policy] A second policy proposal for the Policy SIG



Thank you, Randy.
I hope end sites which really need multihome could 
start to use IPv6 earlier.

Randy Bush wrote:
> toyama-san,
> 
>> (1) the target of portable assignment is limited only to end sites
>>     which are multihomed or plan to be multihomed, while Jordi does
>>     not restrict the target.
>> ...
>> (2) assignment size is same as the size of non-portable assignment, /48,
>>     while Jordi's proposal is /32.
> 
> this actually makes sense from at least this operator's point
> of view.  it solves a real problem and scales as well or better
> than any other approach, with no extra pollution.
> 
> thank you.
> 
> randy
> 
> 
> 


-- 
TOYAMA, Katsuyasu  <toyama.katsuyasu@lab.ntt.co.jp>
IP Technology Expert Team, NTT PF-Labs.
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp.
TEL: +81-(0)422-59-7906  FAX: +81-(0)422-59-5652