Re: [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet

To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet
From: John Tran <john@apnic.net>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:23:03 +1000 (EST)
Cc: Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>, sig-policy@apnic.net
In-reply-to: <17533.3046.666627.176128@roam.psg.com>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1FkURk-00062B-00@alum.sinica.edu> <447CE9A7.4020103@cisco.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0605311123000.18403@durian.apnic.net> <17533.3046.666627.176128@roam.psg.com>


Hi Randy

On Tue, 30 May 2006, Randy Bush wrote:

Since the current IPv6 policy has been implemented we have denied 3
requests. They were mainly from end users.

http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/ipv6-address-policy.html


and would they have qualified under the proposed policy?


Yes they would qualified if we have the proposed policy.

son


randy

References:
- [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet
  - From: "Kenny Huang" <huangk@alum.sinica.edu>
- Re: [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet
  - From: Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>
- Re: [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet
  - From: John Tran <john@apnic.net>
- Re: [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet
Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy] Draft of policy proposal from Jordi Palet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread