Re: [sig-policy]Proposal prop-014-v001.txt - Lowering minimum allocation size and criteria

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Izumi and all,

Izumi Okutani wrote:
Hi Philip,

>
> > BTW, I'm trying to put together an aggregation discussion as part of the
> > Routing SIG, where these and other issues regarding the size of the routing
> > table will be discussed. Hopefully people will be interested in taking part
> > and contributing their thoughts and experiences.
> Yes, that would be an interesting discussion. I think someone from JP
> will be there to share any further comments from our community.

  Yes I agree it should be a very interesting discussion indeed! >:)
I am sure several of our members will be in attendance...  I
shall be awaiting their reports with baited breath.

>
>
> Izumi
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827