[sig-policy] Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

To: ipv6-wg@ripe.net, lir-wg@ripe.net, db-wg@ripe.net, sig-db@lists.apnic.net, sig-policy@lists.apnic.net, apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [sig-policy] Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
From: leo vegoda <leo@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:52:00 +0200
Delivered-to: lists-db-wg-out@lists.ripe.net
In-reply-to: <OF8EC341EA.410846C1-ON80256BD7.00346D6D-80256BD7.00355E5E@radianz.com>
Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
References: <OF8EC341EA.410846C1-ON80256BD7.00346D6D-80256BD7.00355E5E@radianz.com>
Sender: owner-sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 10:42:42AM +0100, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote: Re: RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

[...]

> Wouldn't it be a good idea to standardize the terminology with ARIN and 
> others? 

Section two of the IPv6 policy document is the "Definitions"
section. It defines RIR, NIR, LIR, ASN, Allocation and Assignment
among other things.

Regards,

-- 
leo vegoda
RIPE NCC, Registration Services
Assistant Manager 
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to sig-policy-request@apnic.net *

Prev by Date: [sig-policy] Re: [hostmaster-staff] Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6numobjects
Next by Date: [sig-policy] RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Previous by thread: [sig-policy] Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Next by thread: [sig-policy] RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread