Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050-v003 and reversability/modification?

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I should also note that the proposal did not achieve consensus at the
> meeting, and as far as my (possibly, or even probably flawed) 
> understanding of the process goes, we are, at this moment, discussing
> a non-proposal.

to clarify, while it did not achieve consensus at the policy sig meeting
at apnic 26, it was supported on the order of 2:1.

therefore, it is the chairs' understanding that this is an active
proposal under discussion and revision.

randy