| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
Merely pointing out that there are implications to the use of the term globally coordinated policy, a term that has been used many times over the past several months, perhaps a little to glibly. Even a global and coordinated strategy will require commitments, once made, must not be subject to disassembly by the subsequent actions of a single RIR. Once that happens the global and coordinated strategy is neither global or coordinated. Think locally while acting globally is more than just a catchy phrase. Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:38 AM > To: Raul Echeberria > Cc: Ray Plzak; ppml@arin.net; sig-policy@apnic.net > Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy > Proposal > > > I am not necessarily claiming for a global or a coordinated policy > > (maybe yes), but for a global "and" coordinated strategy for dealing > > with a global problem. > > too radical. it is our right to think locally while acting globally. > that's why there are five rirs, right? > > randy
