Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria

[Sam Dickinson <sam@apnic.net>]

Hello Philip

On 29/01/2008, at 06:02 PM, Philip Smith wrote:
> I suppose the question we don't know the answer to is "how many
> organisations simply don't bother applying for IPv6 space because
> they believe they MUST deploy to 200 sites within 2 years".

<snip>

> Has anything like this been asked in any recent member survey
> carried out by KPMG?

APNIC member surveys include a general question about the ease of
applying for APNIC resources. In the 2007 survey, participants were
asked to respond to the following statement:

    "1.6 The processes and requirements to obtain IPv4, IPv6 or ASN
         resources are clear and straightforward"

Two member surveys have been conducted since the IPv6 policy document
was adopted in 2002. In the responses to those surveys, the 'plan
for 200 assignments' criteria was not mentioned as a barrier to
applying for an IPv6 allocation.

Regards

_____________________________________________________________________
Samantha Dickinson                     email:           sam@apnic.net
Policy Officer, APNIC                    sip:      sam@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                   phone:         +61 7 3858 3100
_____________________________________________________________________

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature