Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee

[David Chen <david@twnic.net.tw>]

Dear all,

Thanks MAEMURA for your well consideration. For the suggestion, I 
support to form a closed WG, and the WG is comprised all NIRs and APNIC. 
Should NIRs nominate the participants?

Best Regards,

David Chen


MAEMURA Akinori wrote:

> NIR Colleagues,
>
> Regarding the NIR Fee, JPNIC IP Department has just had a 
> brief discussion.  
> One of the way to look for a reasonable fee schedule is 
> raising some example schedules and/or models and then 
> applying current facts to verify if it is reasonable.
>
> We notice that for verification we need all figures from
> per address fee amount, number of members and total address
> space of all NIRs'. but they are of course not disclosed.
>
>
> I think in this case we should form a *closed* working group
> which contains all NIRs and APNIC Secretariat to share such
> closed data.  
>
> If you agree on this idea;
>
>
> APNIC Secretariat, 
> 	could you prepare a mailing list for this WG?
>
> NIR Colleagues,
> 	please advise who will join this discussion
>
>
> If you don't agree please let us have your comment and idea.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Akinori
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sig-nir mailing list
> sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
>
>