APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists sig-nir 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF



Yamasaki San,

Just to clarify - you would like the Secretariat to report on this
meeting as a BoF at the Member meeting? Is this correct?
If so, will you be presenting?

Does this mean that the training nir bof and the nir policy development
bof will also be separately reported?

The Secretariat is happy to arrange things, whatever you decide.

thanks,
Anne
--


> Maemura-san,
> 
> Yes, the position of the meeting has been ambiguous although this BoF is 
> not open for the public.  That's solely my responsibility.  I suppose 
> this has the similar status as what Izumi has today.
> 
> To clarify the status, I announced to have survey to all participants 
> via mailing list within the BoF.
> 
> 
> Anne,
> 
> Would you please report this BoF to AMM.  We've done that before in 
> Taipei and/or Seoul last year as Maemura-san mentioned.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Shin
> 
> MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
> > Hmm, good point.
> > 
> > I remember NIR systems BoF was reported briefly - that was 
> > by Sanjaya.  But it is not so clear if this NIR systems 
> > BoF is "official" one, at least it is not appeared on the
> > schedule.  
> > 
> > With my sense NIR systems and NIR policy process "BoF"s should
> > be informed in AMM as meaningful activity which NIR community
> > contributes.  I can do that in my NIR SIG Report.
> > 
> > Your thoughts, colleagues?
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Akinori
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409020953210.20543-100000@durian.apnic.net>
> >    "Re: [sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF"
> >    "Anne Lord <anne@apnic.net>" wrote:
> > 
> > | 
> > | One quick question to all - if this was a BOF - do you want to 
> > | report it also at the Member Meeting tomorrow? Traditionally
> > | all SIGs and BoFs re reported briefly at the MM.
> > | 
> > | Let me know
> > | 
> > | thanks
> > | Anne
> > | --
> > | 
> > | 
> > | On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
> > | 
> > | > Thanks Shin,
> > | > 
> > | > I feel like having this report at NIR-SIG today if we are 
> > | > fortunate enough to have time after we have all planned 
> > | > presentations.  Even a brief report would be great for the
> > | > community.
> > | > 
> > | > Regards,
> > | > Akinori
> > | > 
> > | > 
> > | > In message <41364201.1010305@nic.ad.jp>
> > | >    "[sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF"
> > | >    "Shin Yamasaki <yamasaki@nic.ad.jp>" wrote:
> > | > 
> > | > | Dear NIR folks,
> > | > | 
> > | > | Here is a brief report from NIR System Meeting held on Tuesday.
> > | > | 
> > | > | Thank you very much for all presenters and attendees.  Meeting minutes 
> > | > | will be sent to participants.
> > | > | 
> > | > | Shin
> > | > | 
> > | > | 
> > | > | **********************************************************************
> > | > | 
> > | > | Brief report of NIR System BoF 
> > | > | 
> > | > | 
> > | > |                                                               2004/8/31
> > | > |                                                    Shin Yamasaki, JPNIC
> > | > | 
> > | > | Attendees: 13 from APNIC, KRNIC, JPNIC, TWNIC
> > | > | Time held: 4:30 - 5:30 pm
> > | > | 
> > | > | 
> > | > | Presentation 1
> > | > | --------------
> > | > | 
> > | > | Presenter: Terry Mandarson from APNIC
> > | > | Topic:     NIR perspective of the new DNS generation system
> > | > | 
> > | > | Similar presentation as he presents at DNS Operations SIG, but focuses
> > | > | for NIRs.  APNIC's new database-driven reverse zone file generation system.
> > | > | 
> > | > | 
> > | > | Presentation 2
> > | > | --------------
> > | > | 
> > | > | Presenter: Sanjaya from APNIC
> > | > | Topic:     APNIC Registry System Update
> > | > | 
> > | > | Overview and status of APNIC's new registry system as well as XML 
> > | > | interface for NIRs.
> > | > | 
> > | > | 
> > | > | Since the given time period (1 hour) was not enough for discussion, 
> > | > | continuous discussion is expected on the mailing list.
> > | > | 
> > | > | 
> > | > | <End of report>
> > | > | 
> > | > | _______________________________________________
> > | > | sig-nir mailing list
> > | > | sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
> > | > | http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
> > | > 
> > | > _______________________________________________
> > | > sig-nir mailing list
> > | > sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
> > | > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
> > | > 
> > | 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > sig-nir mailing list
> > sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
> > 
> > 
> > 
>