Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering

[Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

| Raphael Ho said the following on 17/3/08 15:44:
|> 1. Would you prefer:
|> a. to use dual-stack on the same port/collision domain
|> b. to have an entirely separate collision domain for v6 peering

a. dual-stack

I think that ISPs are not keen on dedicating extra ports just for v6
and/or the added management headache that comes with vlan tagged ports
and so on.

|> 2. Would you prefer:
|> a. bi-lateral peering
|> b. multi-lateral peering

I prefer a.

but, i am not against an optional route-server for those who want to use
it.

thanks
~ -gaurab

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH3iu9So7fU26F3X0RAmHqAJ9oq8fSbe4GtuKp+q5i19efOU6ROQCgn840
ZtIPwa7E9UxwjtQZyet9BqI=
=tR3P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----