Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering

["Ethern M., Lin" <ethern@ascc.net>]

>Hi everybody,
>
>during the last IX-SIG meeting, there were a few members looking for  
>regional IPv6 peering. We are in the process of getting some IPv6  
>addresses to IPv6 enable our exchanges, and there's a few questions  
>that I'd like to ask.
>
>1. Would you prefer:
>a. to use dual-stack on the same port/collision domain
>b. to have an entirely separate collision domain for v6 peering
>

I would prefer A.

>2. Would you prefer:
>a. bi-lateral peering
>b. multi-lateral peering
>

I would choose B.

>It seems like everybody is doing dual-stack on the same port/collision  
>domain with bilateral peering, although I'd like to hear what you  
>would like to see us deploy.
>

As I know, that the JPIX is using separate domain to test IPv6,
HKIX is in the dual-stack for IPv4/IPv6.

In Taiwan, I do this by segregating v4 and v6 in different
routers for our peers, but we will merge them in the near
future.

BR.,

Ethern
ASCC/TW


=============================
Ethern M., Lin, <ethern@ascc.net>
Network Division
Computing Centre, Academia Sinica
Phone: +886-2-2789-9953
Fax  : +886-2-2783-6444
=============================