[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[apnic-talk][Fwd: [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size]
All,
Your input is needed...
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
--- Begin Message ---
Could somebody summarize what the APNIC objections to changed policy are ?
-hph
|> So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to RIPE
|> lists, and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's
|wrong with
|> assuming consensus, then?
|
|maybe because we have not yet implemented that packets and
|routing information stay only within the ripe region? it's
|the global internet we're affecting.
|
|think locally, act globally
| -- motto of the small view polluter
|
|randy
|
--- End Message ---
