![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
http://www.icannwatch.org/comments.php?op=showreply&tid=9563&sid=1001&pid=9560&mode=thread&order=0&thold=#9563 by michael (froomkin@law.tm) "ICANN appears to be actively avoiding meeting in the US" ==== Michael, It may be that the market for /8s is outside of the U.S. http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space http://lacnic.net/en/transition.html Names are a distraction, to keep people from seeing the deals being made with regard to address space allocations. All of the "ICANN watching" seems to miss how the Multi-Level-Marketing (MLM) Machine is structured and grows. Each /8 owner should be paying each year and the same each year. You might want to comment on whether U.S. laws allow for customers of the same product to be treated differently. Also, how do U.S. Government contractors dispose of assets ? or manage assets ? in a fair way... http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg04670.html "IANA IPv4 allocation list format change" Jim Fleming 128-bit DNS is closer than you think... http://ipv8.dyndns.tv http://ipv8.dyns.cx http://ipv8.no-ip.com http://ipv8.no-ip.biz http://ipv8.no-ip.info http://ipv8.myip.us http://ipv8.dyn.ee http://ipv8.community.net.au * APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List * * To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request@apnic.net *